Skip to main content

Make Up for Ourselves

I really enjoyed working on project three and had a lot of fun collaborating with the women in my group, but I don’t know how much I enjoyed the art we created. It was fun and felt engaging but not necessarily powerful. 

I loved doing make up and using each other as mirrors. It felt engaging because I had a very simple goal of putting on make up as best I could while helping the person across from me do make up as well. There’s something to be said for art which involves simple but active engagement with a partner on stage. I also adored making the sound score with poems and songs woven together. We got some mixed feedback on that part so maybe we needed more direct focus on the sound? 



I believe we had too many ideas that we tried to squish together unsuccessfully though. We knew going into this piece that it wasn’t very audience centered and I didn’t mind that aspect, until we had an audience and they weren’t super involved. I almost wish we could have invited other female identifying people up to the table and did make up with them, because for me, this piece should not have been engaging to men. It was for us (the performers) but it especially wasn’t for them.

Performance Art seems to be about taking things to their most extreme logical conclusion and I know that extremity was not in this piece. I also wonder if maybe the inner message wasn’t extreme enough though? Because I can’t think of any other extreme that could have been taken that wouldn’t have changed the meaning of the piece.

All in all, this was fun to work on and the people were great to work with. But I hope we can collaborate on other pieces and not try and move this one forward.

Comments

  1. I just wrote a lengthy comment and it disappeared!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I will try again! I think the reason this piece did not go anywhere is because it was what it was and did not push any buttons. You hit upon reasons in your comments, Cassie. The audience was not engaged -- they were wondering what it was about, what to think about. Performance art is idea based and the ideas come from life -- be they absurd or mysterious or confrontational. It is meant to challenge, provoke, engage an audience - bc it is live. Topics include mortality, work, food, sex, money, the consumer culture, etc. This work maybe was going in too many directions? It did not involve your audience, nor did it have a direct, powerful message. But! This class was a place for you to experiment and explore ideas and this is what you did. This process pushed you further and helped you create your final work.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Our Carcinogens

As my first performance comes to an end, I am intrigued by how much I enjoy my work. I usually don't fully love the art I create. The self-doubt is always really prominent within my critique of my own work. However, I believe this piece to be a simple representation of a complex idea in a manner which causes the audience to think. That's all I can ask. During my critique period, Steven had suggested that my list of carcinogens get longer and scarier. This was an interesting idea that could have changed the meaning of my piece. But I decided to stay with my simple list for 2 reasons; 1) It is very easy to make even the safest sounding materials sound scary. For example, dihydrogen monoxide sounds scary to anyone unfamiliar with chemistry. But it is simply water. I felt that if I began listing off complex chemical names, that the story I was telling would change drastically. It would become a commentary on how easily the public can be fooled, rather than how awful the

Reperformance of Wall/Floor Positions

I was thrilled to re-perform Wall/Floor Positions by Bruce Nauman. After seeing him perform his Walking in an Exaggerated Manner piece in class, I was deeply inspired by his use of body as sculpture and art. I knew I wanted to present a work of his so when I found Wall/Floor Positions, it seemed pretty perfect. I’m disappointed that I wasn’t able to perform the full 60 minute piece but I of course understand, and may still endeavor to do so in the future. The 7 minute section I chose to perform was a section that engaged me deeply. I don’t know if it was the movement that was repetitive but still fresh as it was performed on different sides of the body, or if the movement itself spoke to me in terms of line and form but it was a thrill to recreate. It also had a clear beginning and I could create a decent ending to it. In order to recreate this piece, I engaged with it repetitively and tried to walk myself through the pieces of movement. I was able to find clothes that m