Skip to main content

Make Up for Ourselves

I really enjoyed working on project three and had a lot of fun collaborating with the women in my group, but I don’t know how much I enjoyed the art we created. It was fun and felt engaging but not necessarily powerful. 

I loved doing make up and using each other as mirrors. It felt engaging because I had a very simple goal of putting on make up as best I could while helping the person across from me do make up as well. There’s something to be said for art which involves simple but active engagement with a partner on stage. I also adored making the sound score with poems and songs woven together. We got some mixed feedback on that part so maybe we needed more direct focus on the sound? 



I believe we had too many ideas that we tried to squish together unsuccessfully though. We knew going into this piece that it wasn’t very audience centered and I didn’t mind that aspect, until we had an audience and they weren’t super involved. I almost wish we could have invited other female identifying people up to the table and did make up with them, because for me, this piece should not have been engaging to men. It was for us (the performers) but it especially wasn’t for them.

Performance Art seems to be about taking things to their most extreme logical conclusion and I know that extremity was not in this piece. I also wonder if maybe the inner message wasn’t extreme enough though? Because I can’t think of any other extreme that could have been taken that wouldn’t have changed the meaning of the piece.

All in all, this was fun to work on and the people were great to work with. But I hope we can collaborate on other pieces and not try and move this one forward.

Comments

  1. I just wrote a lengthy comment and it disappeared!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I will try again! I think the reason this piece did not go anywhere is because it was what it was and did not push any buttons. You hit upon reasons in your comments, Cassie. The audience was not engaged -- they were wondering what it was about, what to think about. Performance art is idea based and the ideas come from life -- be they absurd or mysterious or confrontational. It is meant to challenge, provoke, engage an audience - bc it is live. Topics include mortality, work, food, sex, money, the consumer culture, etc. This work maybe was going in too many directions? It did not involve your audience, nor did it have a direct, powerful message. But! This class was a place for you to experiment and explore ideas and this is what you did. This process pushed you further and helped you create your final work.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Our Carcinogens

As my first performance comes to an end, I am intrigued by how much I enjoy my work. I usually don't fully love the art I create. The self-doubt is always really prominent within my critique of my own work. However, I believe this piece to be a simple representation of a complex idea in a manner which causes the audience to think. That's all I can ask. During my critique period, Steven had suggested that my list of carcinogens get longer and scarier. This was an interesting idea that could have changed the meaning of my piece. But I decided to stay with my simple list for 2 reasons; 1) It is very easy to make even the safest sounding materials sound scary. For example, dihydrogen monoxide sounds scary to anyone unfamiliar with chemistry. But it is simply water. I felt that if I began listing off complex chemical names, that the story I was telling would change drastically. It would become a commentary on how easily the public can be fooled, rather than how awful the ...

A Run in My Tights

This is by far my favorite piece I've created in this class. It speaks to something I have experienced before, but also something I've experienced harshly this year. No one seems to want to get to know me, they don't want clear communication, they don't want to get to the truth of any matter. They would rather pummel me into the dirt and smear my name rather than come to understand who I am. This piece was partly for them. Not necessarily to change their mind, nor to show them who I am, but to lay out the damage they have done, plain as day and show them, even if I spend years undoing what they've done to me, they've still caused me considerable damage. And if they don't care, that's their prerogative, but I refuse to let them forget it. But this piece is also for the people who have been put down and have had to work through their hardship. It is representative of a common way that human beings hurt each other. We constantly, as tribalistic creat...